![]() 09/09/2013 at 00:36 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
The lack of wing was made up for in chrome paint, I assure you.
Also, safe to say the 9th gen Si grew on me today. Looks much improved lowered on RPF1's wrapped in slicks.
![]() 09/09/2013 at 00:45 |
|
We need to find the one guy who didn't super wing his Rauh-Welt.
![]() 09/09/2013 at 00:49 |
|
Dear god, I love RWBs!
![]() 09/09/2013 at 01:00 |
|
Not bad.
![]() 09/09/2013 at 01:02 |
|
Yeah I kind of want a yellow shirt like that
![]() 09/09/2013 at 01:04 |
|
*relative lack of wing
There's still a wing, it's just sort-of-stock looking.
I can't get past that bumper though. It just ruins the whole shape I think, with the chrome and all ending prematurely. Maybe if the rocker panels were matte black too.
![]() 09/09/2013 at 01:05 |
|
Damn it, kinja, that's not what I clicked.
![]() 09/09/2013 at 01:06 |
|
See, I call that a spoiler
![]() 09/09/2013 at 01:12 |
|
Ah, I see.
I usually reserve "wing" for any upturned bodywork on the rear (ducktail, whaletail, integrated section). "splitter" for any lower body work on the front (air dam, 458 Italia 'vanes', any corner vanes), and "spoiler" for any raised section (up on struts)
Wing:
Splitter:
Spoiler:
But these are totally informal and it probably varies by region, so I doubt they're correct.
![]() 09/09/2013 at 01:27 |
|
We're on the same page with splitter, just reversed with regards to spoiler/wing.
![]() 09/09/2013 at 01:53 |
|
DAT BEHIND
![]() 09/09/2013 at 05:26 |
|
Maybe this is more accurate.
![]() 09/09/2013 at 05:28 |
|
http://oppositelock.jalopnik.com/maybe-this-is-…
Thanks to your first shot, I was able to dial in the sights.
![]() 09/09/2013 at 05:44 |
|
#fiveminutephotoshop
![]() 09/09/2013 at 13:59 |
|
Am I the only one that hates Rauh Welt Porsches?